17/11/2009

ALL ABOUT THE BRONTES : A NEW CHALLENGE FOR THE NEW YEAR

I'm going to wrap -up the two challenges I've been involved in in 2009 and I'm a bit sad because they have been motivating, stimulating and great fun. Challenges can really bright up ordinary blogging and make it much more exciting.

THE EVERYTHING AUSTEN CHALLENGE ( hosted by STEPHANIE'S WRITTEN WORD) is  only one step from the final goal, just one task  missing : MANSFIELD PARK (comparing different adaptations). You can see my posts for this challenge clicking on the links in the right column.


For THE PERIOD DRAMA CHALLENGE, I've completed my tasks for the section THROUGH THE CENTURIES and h ave almost finished with VICTORIAN MIST too ( just two reviews, and I'm working on one these days)
See my LIST OF TASKS in the right column.

Now at LAURA'S REVIEWS I've just found a new challenge for 2010 which I couldn't miss:



Challenge Details


1. The All About the Brontes challenge will run from January 1st to June 30, 2010.
2. You can read a book, watch a movie, listen to an audiobook, anything Bronte related that you would like. Reading, watching, or listening to a favorite Bronte related item again for the second, third, or more time is also allowed.

3. The goal will be to read, watch, listen, to 3 to 6 (or beyond) anything Bronte items.

4. You can sign-up by posting your blog entry on the number of items and what items you would like to do for this challenge  in Mr. Linky. Don't worry, you can do different things than you have listed.

Now my problem is ... I've already posted several times about the Brontes and their works on FLY HIGH! in the last months and I usually like to choose new tasks and read or watch new stuff for my challenges ...
My Brontes based posts are:

1. SHIRLEY, CHARLOTTE BRONTE'S HISTORICAL NOVEL

2. A WUTHERING WEEKEND

3.THE TENANT OF WILDFELL HALL by ANNE BRONTE

4. AGNES GREY by ANNE BRONTE

What have I not read yet? What could I choose for my new challenge? Here's my 6-task list for now. Let's see if I can stick with it. I'll start posting in January 2010 so I have time to change my mind before that date. But I like it very much so, maybe, it won't change.

1. Re-watching Jane Eyre

comparative watching : Zeffirelli’s Movie 1996 / BBC 2006 Adaptation

2. Villette by Charlotte Bronte
Review of the book (first reading)

3. The Professor by Charlotte Bronte
Review of the book (first reading)

4. Gothic Brontes

5. BBC Sparkhouse: a reverse & modern version of Wuthering Heights?
(re-watching and comparing the characters with the original)

6. The Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys
Review of the book (first reading)

Do you like the Brontes? Do you want to sign-up? Follow the links in this post and join the fun!

14/11/2009

SATURDAY NIGHT CLASSIC READING : PERSUASION


My favourite Austen's is PERSUASION. It is her last novel and the one whose protagonist I most sympathize with. Have a look at the right column of my blog: I AM ANNE ELLIOT. I've never met  a Captain Wentworth, or, better, I've never re-met him after a long separation ... a Wentworth maybe  lost forever  in my past. Perhaps this is why I love this story and each time I'm moved at the two protagonists'  delayed  but intense final gratification and happiness. Tonight, surfing the Net, I've found this video with Greg Wise (do you remember Willoughby 1995?) reading PERSUASION. I listened to him and ...  loved being persuaded by this handsome man!


Do you want to try? Take 15 minutes off,  make a cup of good long coffee, sit ,  relax... and enjoy the reading!
 (CLICK ON THE LINK UNDER THE PICTURE)


Excellent reading, wasn't it? Now let's see how this beautiful finale, written by Jane Austen in the last years of her short  life, was interpreted and transformed in  two Tv adaptations , BBC 1995 and ITV 2007.

BBC 1995 PERSUASION ( ending)




ITV 2007 PERSUASION
ENDING PART I








ITV 2007 PERSUASION
ENDING PART II








13/11/2009

RA PHOTO FRIDAY - TENDER LUCAS

For this week RA Photo Friday, I decided to follow Mulubinba's thread. She proposed a series of kissing images from various works ( North and South, Vicar of Dibley, The Impressionists, and others) titled "Nobody does it better" .
I've chosen to concentrate on Lucas North   since Friday is also SPOOKS day (episode 3 is on BBC3 tonight at 9 p.m.) and I've chosen to "investigate" on his ... capability for love and tenderness. Can this man, able to kill someone with his own bare hands, be also capable of tender feelings?
Lucas North is a maverick. It is hard to know what he really has in his mind. He is a good secret agent, loyal to MI5 and to his boss Harry Pearce, but what about his private life? In series 7, his marriage had wrecked 'cause Elizabeta wanted more from him, she felt he hid something and would later discover what it was. He seems to be still in love with her after 8 years spent in a Russian prison. But hasn't he only created a bond in his mind in order to survive torture and hardship? Does the Beta he has in his mind still exist? Any answer you are willing to give... Look at the pictures below. He actually seems to care for her.





In series 8 Lucas meets CIA agent in London, Sarah Caufield. He's attracted to her. Their relationship is a passionate confrontation of two strong personalities. Very little tenderness in their first approaches and we all expect hot, steamy scenes between the two. Unfortunately, she seems stronger than him, she has led the game so far . Let's see how many troubles she will bring to him. Fingers crossed for our hero!



HAPPY SPOOKS NIGHT TO ALL OF YOU WATCHING EPISODE THREE TONIGHT!!!


12/11/2009

YOUNG VICTORIA


When I was in London last April, it was still on but, not being there alone, I couldn't see it.  I really wanted to watch this movie for several reasons - I love costume films, the Victorian Age, Queen Victoria as a historical figure, Victorian literature... - I couldn't miss it.  So Amazon UK was my saviour. It's the latest addition to my collection: YOUNG VICTORIA 2009 starring Emily Blunt, Rupert Fiend,  Miranda Richardson, Mark Strong.
I've recently seen it and just wanted to share some points with you.
The film is a romantic dramatisation of some of the events preceding and following the coronation of Queen Victoria, focusing on her early reign and romance with Prince Albert in the 1830s.
 Enough attention is given to Victoria's attitude to life and power, with a good  convincing characterization. Less realistic seems Prince Albert's portrayal: he is depicted as a youg prince, ready to satisfy his father's will, trying to flatter his young, beautiful, powerful cousin in order to fulfil political aims, planning strategies to  please Victoria as a political duty. Official biographies want him really in love with her: they were good friends first of all, then lovers, then husband and wife. Furthermore, Victoria's uncle, Leopold I of Belgium,was not as pushy and selfish in persuading Albert to marry the queen in real life as he was portrayed in the film. The Belgian King was Victoria's favorite uncle and served as a sort of father figure to her.

What surprised me most was young Victoria's relationship with power: I have always seen royals as human beings in golden cages. I mean, they live glamourous lives in wonderful palaces but totally lack freedom in my mind. In this film, Victoria, instead, after feeling herself as a prisoner of her mother's will and Sir John Conroy's  (her mother's lover and personal secretary) pressure,  she saw becoming the Queen of England as a liberation. So power = freedom.
The movie also underlines the great solitude she had to experience, especially before marrying Albert. And this, I guess, was  what brought her to the serious depression which followed his death:  to be brought again into that nightmarish solitude .

VICTORIA AND ALBERT IN OFFICIAL BIOGRAPHIES





Victoria, the daughter of the duke of Kent and Princess Victoria of Saxe-Coburg, was born in 1819. She inherited the throne of Great Britain at the age of 18, upon the death of her uncle William IV in 1837, and reigned until 1901, bestowing her name upon her age. She married her mother's nephew, Albert (1819-1861), prince of Saxe-Coburg Gotha, in 1840, and until his death he remained the focal point of her life (she bore him nine children).

Albert replaced Lord Melbourne, the Whig Prime Minister who had served her as her first personal and political tutor and instructor, as Victoria's chief advisor. Albert was moralistic, conscientious and progressive, if rather priggish, sanctimonious, and intellectually shallow, and with Victoria initiated various reforms and innovations— he organized the Great Exhibition of 1851, for example— which were responsible for a great deal of the popularity later enjoyed by the British monarchy. (In contrast to the Great Exhibition, housed in the Crystal Palace and viewed by proud Victorians as a monument to their own cultural and technological achievements, however, we may recall that the government over which Victoria and Albert presided had, in the midst of the potato famine of 1845, continued to permit the export of grain and cattle from Ireland to England while over a million Irish peasants starved to death).




HISTORICAL INACCURACIES

In this beautiful filmed portrayal of Queen Victoria and her beloved Prince Albert there are few historical inaccuracies  that can be interesting to notice.
1. Victoria was left handed; however, in the film she draws and paints with her right hand
2. Prince Albert was never shot during an assassination attempt on Queen Victoria: the bullet missed him.

UNBELIEVABLE TRUE FACTS


(above -  Mark Strong as John Conroy and
Miranda Richardson as Victoria's mother, the Duchess of Kent)

The scene where Conroy, her mother's lover,  is trying to make Victoria sign the paper when she is ill and she throws it to the floor - it's completely true and the scene in Windsor where the King stands up and insults Victoria's mother is not only true, but about two-thirds of his speech is what he actually said. However, the duchess of Kent was seated next to the King when he spoke  and did not leave during the speech; and, undepicted in the film, the princess burst into tears "and the two parties, soon realizing that they had gone too far, patched up an uneasy truce . According to Greville's Memoirs: "The Queen looked in deep distress, the Princess burst into tears, and the whole company were aghast. The Duchess of Kent said not a word. Immediately after they rose and retired, and a terrible scene ensued; the Duchess announced her immediate departure and ordered her carriage, but a sort of reconciliation was patched up, and she was prevailed upon to stay till the next day".





Though I know this is predictable and obvious, I particularly loved the costumes and locations. Mark Strong , who was a "good" wicked Sir Conroy, and Jim Broadbent, a convincing King William. I had already loved Emily Blunt as Prudie in THE JANE AUSTEN BOOK CLUB  and she has been an extraordinary young queen in this movie. Rupert Fiend as Albert? Still thinking about it ...

11/11/2009

A FALCON IN LOVE WITH A DOVE - EPISODE 4 - PHOTO STORY

PREVIOUS POSTS







Giulio and his mates enter the convent at night to kidnap Elena but it's a trap: Elena's mother's men are there to kill him.


Lisetta, seeing the result of her betrayal and feeling guilty, tries to help Giulio killing a nun.


After the failed attempt to kidnap Elena, Giulio and his friends manages to escape. Elena faces her mother:
"Last night someone risked his life for me and it wasn't you. You betrayed  and deceived me. You are dead to me"



Giulio and his friends run and hide in the woods but Armido is tired of risking his life for Giulio's impossible love story. He decides to leave the rest of the group.


Lisetta is caught and accused of murder.


Donna Vittoria comes to the convent to help Elena who fears for her lover's life.


Giulio tries to catch his followers' attention on himself so that his mates can run away undisturbed. One of them is badly injured and needs immediate  cure and rest .


Giulio is publicly excommunicated and condemned to death.


Elena is terribly worried for Giulio's life.


Lisetta finds a way to escape imprisonment and , by chance, meets Armido, who is going to Rome that has been attacked and conquered by Cardinal Pompeo Colonna. She confesses: " I nearly managed to have you all killed!" But he suggests her to join him to Rome. He has always loved her, who, instead, only loves Giulio.



Giulio finds refuge in Don Vitello's house, a priest and Donna Vittoria's friend.



The Pope escapes into Castel S. Angelo while Cardinal Colonna settles in his new Roman residence.


Elena and her loyal maid Marietta leaves the convent at night disguised as workmen.


Lisetta rejects Armido's advances who is now furious to her and to ...Giulio.


Elena tries to discover if Giulio has asked Cardinal Colonna for help. But she's harshly sent away .

Where can she find Giulio then?  Where could he go to look for her?
To the Madonnella, the place where they met the first time, the place where they wanted to celebrate their wedding.


Elena's mother takes Cardinal Colonna a message from Prince Savelli: he is ready to give Colonna a lot of money if he accepts to find and kill Giulio. He knows him very well, he is the only one who can find Giulio.

Cardinal Colonna asks Armido to find Giulio and to kill him and , of course, he accepts since he is very jelous of him.


Meanwhile Elena and Giulio are guests of Donna Vittoria's friends at Michelangelo Buonarroti's luxurious house. Donna Vittoria is waiting for them in Ischia. She wants to create a place for artists and poets, love and arts in that beautiful island .


At the embark for Ischia that night they will be attacked by Armido and other men. They shoot at Giulio, who dives into the sea, and keep Elena as a prisoner.

08/11/2009

WIVES & DAUGHTERS - From the book to the TV screen




I've recently read and posted ( HERE ) about Elizabeth Gaskell's beautiful last unfinished  novel, Wives & Daughters, and I 've soon after decided it was time to watch the BBC 1999 adaptation in four episodes I had in my DVD collection but hadn't seen yet - I usually prefer reading the book first!
The script was by Andrew Davies, who also adapted for the screen several of Austen's works, among other classics.

It does not very often happens  to me , while comparing a book to its filmed adaptation, but it seemed I was re-reading the story, I was not at all disappointed at what I was watching and listening to. Very little, insignificant changes didn't interfere with the atmospheres and characterizations Gaskell had wanted to convey. I particularly loved Justine Waddel as Molly Gibson, Keelye Hawes as Cynthia, Rosamund Pike as Lady Harriet and , infinitely, Michael Gambon as Squire Hamley.
If you look for another John Thornton in Roger Hamley, leave it, you won't find one. He's rather dull , too patient , too naive to be compared. The hero and the heroine in this story, that is Molly and Roger, are the symbols of unselfish love, they are so generous and ready to self -denial that one is let to think they are rather unbelievable characters. Too good to be true. But I like them, though they can sound dull,too sensible or too little passionate. What I appreciate is that  they can really love people.
If there is something I didn't much like in this series is ... the ending Davies wrote. It was not what I expected.  It was a happy ending, of course, as Mrs Gaskell had surely planned, but not as lively or as exciting as I had imagined it. Judge yourself watching the clip below.
Mrs Gaskell narration had stopped at Roger Hamley waving at Molly from afar, outside her house, under  heavy rain. Then he leaves for Africa for two years... See what happens in the Tv drama, instead.



06/11/2009

SPOOKS 8 & RA PHOTO FRIDAY




The first episode of the new series had an audience of 6.01 million (a 24.8% share), according to Digital Spy. That's higher than the audience for last year's opening episode, which was 5.5 million. So...Good news! Maybe we'll have Spooks 9.
To take part in RA Photo Friday , which has been on for several weeks now on RA's dedicated blogs (though mine  is not one of them or , at least, it is but only from time to time and  among many other things) I've taken some caps from the titles (and not only) of the new series. It started being aired last Wedenesday night. I like the new titles, they really convey the frantic atmosphere you live watching MI5 section D's adventures. As I've read somewhere, " a rollercoaster of emotions"!







I know the quality is not very good. But the rythm of the images is so fast...frantic, indeed. What excitement! Do you want to have a look at them?



 

Now, to close this brief post, what would you do if someone as handsome as Richard/Lucas looked at you like this?


(Swooon!)

Or this?



(Lost!)

I left some of Sarah Caufield's blond hair in the picture, dreaming it was me...but it is NOT! : -(

You can find RA Photo Friday also at

http://mulubinba.typepad.com/an_ra_viewers_perspective/2009/11/photo-friday-here-at-33s-061009.html

http://armitagefanblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/photo-friday-bunch-of-mumbo-jumbo.html

http://www.galacticmuffin.net/day17/

You can see three clips from the first episode at Annette's site


Tonight episode 2 is on BBC3 at 9.p.m.

04/11/2009

ELIZABETH GASKELL'S WIVES AND DAUGHTERS


A wonderful suspended story

After reading 915 pages, and after finishing the last ones just few minutes ago , what a pity that I have to go to sleep without knowing what will happen to Molly and Roger. I’m sure Mrs Gaskell would have written such a touching finale for such a great novel. I‘ve read somewhere – and I’m convinced it is true – that she was thinking of writing something like the end of her North and South: Roger would come back after six months and his proposal to Molly would start with his giving her the dried rose he had carefully and lovingly kept all that time and which Molly herself had given to him before his departure. Just then, Molly would understand that the time of her full, long-wished for, happiness had come. Romantic story!

Only that …


On November 12th, 1865 , with only a few pages to be written, Mrs. Gaskell was sitting round the fire after tea with her daughters in the country house in Hampshire which she had just bought in readiness for her husband's retirement. Suddenly, in the middle of a sentence, she fell forward and died of a heart attack. Whether she had previous attacks we do not know - if she had, she said nothing about them. She was 55. Sad story!

Again. What a pity we can’t read the beautiful scene she had in mind to close this long , amusing, well-written novel which had been published in the Cornhill Magazine as a serial from August 1864 to January 1866.

To know more about the plot, click HERE.


Parents & Children


Elizabeth Gaskell was very good at depicting beautiful romances, but after reading several of her novels, I noticed that she was actually eagerly interested in parent /child relationships and very good at depicting their little nuances, were they complex, troubled, loving , deep or shallow ones.

Only in Wives & Daughters we have several examples, which are all different but  equally meant to show how important, in a character’s life , filial or parental love can be, how much these bonds affect an individual’s growing up, the formation of his/her personality and his/her frame of mind.
Cynthia and Osborne are spoilt by the wrong type of bond with their parents: too little love for the first and too much of it for the latter have made them very little responsible and rather selfish people. Roger, though always misjudged and not very much loved by his parents, comes to be an extraordinarily good man (though not always wise, i.e. his love for Cynthia).

We find many other examples:

1. Molly and her father

2. Mrs Hamley / Osborne

3. Mr Hamley /Osborne

3. Mrs Kirkpatrick and Cynthia

4. Aimée and her little boy, Roger


Mrs Gaskell is not new to this sensitive approach to human basic love bonds. She had described John (the father) and Mary’s (the daughter)very exclusive relationship in MARY BARTON (1848) without saving us her reproach for some negative aspects:

After Mrs Barton’s death “ Between the father and the daughter there existed in full force that mysterious bond which unites  those who have been loved by one who is now dead and gone. While he was harsh and silent to others, he humoured Mary with tender love; she had more of her own way than is common in any rank with girls of her age. Part of this was the necessity of the case; for of course all the money went thrugh her hands, and the household arrangements were guided by her will and pleasure. But part was her father's indulgence, for he left her, with full trust in her unusual sense and spirit, to choose her own associates, and her own times for seeing them." (p. 23)


In NORTH AND SOUTH (1855) Margaret’s deep love for her unfortunate father matches with John Thornton’s strong attachment to his overbearing mother.





Gossip and rumours

While Mary Barton and North and South are mainly set in big industrial towns, Manchester and Milton (fictitious name for Manchester itself), Wives & Daughters , like Cranford, is set in a small countryside village, an enclosed and enclosing environment Mrs Gaskell had known very well in her youth. In both her country novels, she highlights the reality of gossiping and spreading rumours, which could ruin and forever a person’s reputation, but that are, indeed,  comical features in her stories.

Molly risks to spoil her reputation to help her step-sister. She’s seen alone with handsome Mr Preston in isolated places or exchanging letters with him. She knows she didn’t do anything wrong; after a first astonished and angry reaction, her father believes in her good faith. But she has to bravely bear  everything happening to her – the looks, the smiles, the whispers - and wait patiently for the end of all that malevolent interest in her person. Is this Gaskell’s recipe to fight rumours?



Romance



In Wives and Daughters, Gaskell's  mastery gets to the highest point, its really a delight to follow her gifted story-telling and her careful characterization. You find plot, intrigue and romance in it. Yes, romance. Involving and moving as in North and South, blossoming from a long-lasting friendship as in Mary Barton.

Molly loves Roger in a very generous, disinterested way. She suffers seeing that Cynthia, her step-sister, accepts to be engaged to him but not because she is jelous and wants Roger for herself. She suffers because she knows Cynthia doesn’t love him, is not really interested in him, and he , deeply in love with her, is going to be disappointed and heartbroken.


This is the kind of love Mrs Gaskell thinks worth the name: patient, generous, disinterested, long-lasting, time – resistant. Other examples are, John Thornton helping Margaret to be cleared of any accusation and still loving her even after her blunt, offended/ing refusal of his proposal (North and South) ;or Jem Wilson, silently loving Mary Barton, who sees him just like a brother or an old friend, and watching her flirt with rich and handsome Mr Carson (Mary Barton).

RELATED POSTS