12/06/2010

MY BLOGGER BUDDIES - MEET KATHLEEN


This week I'm proud to introduce another of my special talented buddies. Kathleen is an Art historian, lives and works in New York City,  practises  fencing ,  writes three different blogs, is in search of a rich husband and has a crush on Mrs Gaskell's John Thornton (which is also how I happened to find her in the blogosphere) . Enjoy our chat.

Please, Kathleen, could you briefly tell us something about yourself?


I’ll steal a little bit from my blog bio pages (and Henry James) here: “Her ideas of enjoyment were very simple; she enjoyed putting on her new hat, with its redundancy of feather, and twenty cents appeared to her a very large sum.”
I’m an economist turned art historian and am thus your quintessential over-educated and underpaid recent grad school graduate. I was born and raised in a suburb of Manhattan, and as I bounce back and forth between gritty NYC and landscaped Westchester, I try to lead a life that balances my country-gal ways with my big-city personality. I enjoy hiking and kayaking excursions followed by lazy afternoons on the porch as much as I enjoy exploring the fast-paced Avenues and Cross Streets of my beloved New York City.

I finished my masters in art history last year and since then have split my time between the art world (I worked at the Museum of Modern Art for several months) and the sport of fencing. I have big aspirations – maybe an Olympic team, maybe a book, definitely a PhD, and absolutely a career in a museum. Of course, while I’m working on all those plans, I’m just another blogger waiting to be discovered.

(The Columbia Fencing media guide with Kathleen  on the cover)


 New York City! What is it like to live in such an iconic metropolis? What are the pros and cons according to you?
I pronounce water “waatah” and cheer for the Yankees like it’s a second job. When I go abroad and people ask me if I’m American, I say “No, I’m a New Yorker.” Paris has its boulevards; Rome has its ruins; Toronto has its endearing Canadianess, but I can’t imagine calling any city other than New York my home. It’s inhabitant friendly (great public transport, fantastic restaurants,etc.) and culturally rich (Museum Mile, Carnegi Hall, and so on). But perhaps what I love most about my city is that it allows for individuality. Sure, as home to Wall Street and as the financial capital of North America, there is an expectation that you’ll join the corporate machine. But in truth, it is a city filled with people pursuing their own dreams – whether it’s to own a bakeshop in Tribeca or photograph models on a runway. Go out for a drink and you’ll meet the lawyers and investments bankers you’d expect to knock elbows with, but you’ll also meet writers, artists, athletes, bohemians, and intellects. Does it have cons? Of course. It has its grubby side streets, its overpriced rents, its tourist hotbeds. But all in all, when you’re in New York, you really do believe you can be whatever you want to be when you grow-up.

 (Kathleen in her second job, cheering for the Yankees!)

 Art is your work and it is apparently also something you love very much. You often blog about works of art on Meet me in the drawing room. Can you tell us more about it?
I’m an only child who learned early how to amuse myself – mostly through coloring books. When I was a wee thing, my motto was “you can never have enough crayons.” I always knew that I wanted to puruse some sort of career in the arts – originally as a fashion designer, then as a critique, finally as a curator/academic. I enjoy looking at art but perhaps more than that, I love learning the backstory behind a work. When I’m researching something, I feel like Sherlock Holmes – digging my way through dusty archives, looking for clues in the seemingly mundane, stockpiling hundreds of relevant sources, uncovering a seemingly endless chain of possible leads. If you’re ever looking for me at the Museum of Modern Art, or the Metropolitan, I’m that nerd standing in front of a painting you’ve never heard of taking copious notes with a gleam in her eye.

Have you seen my favourite painting in my sidebar on the right? It was love at first sight wit Friederich’s Wanderer and I just can’t say exactly why. Then I’ve got Monet and the Impressionists as well as Caravaggio among the artists I love. What about you? Have you got a painting which is really special to you? Any artist or movement?

The Wanderer is also one of my favorite paintings! Talk about the sublime!


There are two works that are very important to me. The first is Rodin’s “The Burghers of Calais.” I saw it for the first time when I was 13 and it was the first artwork that ever made me really think about art as something more significant than a decorative flourish. I try to make a pilgrimage to one of the castings every few months (the Met has a complete set of the figures) because it still sends shivers down my spine.



The second work is an 1885 self-portrait by American painter Ellen Day Hale (above). The portrait hung in the 2006 “Americans in Paris: 1860-1900” exhibition at New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art and I was immediately transfixed by the sitter’s lofty but knowing gaze and the mastery with which she was painted. I was intrigued. What began as an interest in one artist and one painting quickly turned into a fascination with an entire period of artistic production – I’m crazy about art from the 1860s to the end of the 1930s. Thanks to an undergraduate paper I wrote on the portrait, I was accepted back into Columbia for my MA, where I wrote my thesis on Hale.

These days, I’m very much into the German Expressionists – hence my recent attempt at learning German.

German is a very difficult language, but you're tenacious Kathleen and you'll make it!  Now, from languages to ... reading. What kind of reader are you? Where and when do you usually read? Do you prefer to buy or borrow books? What about e-books? Have you got favourite genres and authors?
I’m actually a terrible reader. I love to read, but I’m slow and plodding. I like to underline and highlight and savor chapters. It takes me ages to get through books. Of course, just like you, I love Austen. I just finished Mansfield Park – the only one I hadn’t read. I also adore W. Somerset Maugham, Steinbeck, Vonnegut, and Camus. I’ll read anything, though I tend to avoid fantasy, sci-fi, and contemporary novels (I have too many classics to catch up on). I like to read about people, real or fabricated.

I have a Kindle, which was a MA graudation gift, and I generally have mixed feelings about it. It’s absolutely easier to travel with the sleek digital version of War and Peace. But at the end of the day, I’m a book lover who wants to turn and dog-ear pages while she marks up margins. My bookshelves are my pride and joy.

What is the best book you’ve recently read? And the one you often re-read or leaf through?
I’m currently reading “The Razor’s Edge” and I think it’s destined to become my all-time favourite. It’s highly quotable, so I feel like it will join “Pride and Prejudice” as a book I thumb through almost weekly. The Grapes of Wrath is also one I turn to frequently for one reason or another.

Somerset Maugham, then. Let us know why it was so special to you. Maybe on one of your blogs. I mentioned one of them , Meet me in the Drawing Room, but you’ve recently started writing a second one, They Told Me to Find a Rich Husband. Can you explain what do you love to blog about and what are the differences between them?
My first blog was actually “AlleyKat’s Corner Cafe” – a recipe blog I update rarely, but am still very loyal to. Meet Me in the Drawing Room is a venue for me to express my passions for art, literature, and travel. It was originally conceived of as “Voyages in a Discovery” (referring to the Land Rover Discovery that takes me all around the country), but it inevitably expanded to reflex my diverse but constant interests. My catch-phrase for the blog is “It’s where the ladies entertain and the gentlemen retire” – a reference to the old-time role of the drawing room as a domestic meeting place.

As for They Told me to Find a Rich Husband, that was my attempt at becoming the next Carrie Bradshaw. The content and title are inspired by the #1 piece of advice people give me after they ask what I plan to do with my master’s degree: “Find yourself a nice, rich husband.” It’s a place to make fun of social expectations and male-female relationships. It’s also a place to address what it means to fall in (and out of) love. And sometimes I use it as a place to gush about Richard Armitage... you know, it just can’t be helped.

:o Really? I thought you just had a literary crush on John Thornton and ...I find out now you are instead another victim of Mr RA's blue eyes spell! Welcome on board, K.! But we'll talk about this later. First let's finish talking about blogging.  When and Why did you start ? What has blogging  added to your real lifeI started blogging in the fall of 2008, when I in the early phases of writing my master’s thesis. It was a much needed alternative to the heavy academic research/writing I was doing in grad school. I have always kept a journal and a notebook of “essay ideas,” but the practice of blogging forced me to turn those little jots into something more substantial, even if informal.
My friends keep up with my blogs, which is very nice of them (they must be bored at work!). Often one of my posts will be a jumping-off point for a dinner/night-out discussion, or someone will suggest that I blog about this topic or that event. I started blogging as a way to engage with the public at large. Turns out, generating post topics has been a great excuse for a wine night with my wingmen and women.

I also read about your journeys on your blog. Do you like travelling? What are the places you love travelling to ?
Travel is very important to me, and practically every month I spend a few nights in a hotel room. Thanks to fencing, I’ve been all over Europe and the US for competitions. But of all the places I’ve been, France and Italy are my favorite European destinations – everything about them is captivating. The food, the locales, the people – I just can’t get enough. I also love traveling through Canada. I have family there, but everytime I get to cross the border, I get to pack my hiking boots and kayaking gear. I may be a city girl, but I’m very much a wilderness junkie, and Canada is very much a “Big Wild.”



Here we are now. I perfectly remember how I found you online about a year ago. I was writing a post, Mr Darcy vs Mr Thornton while re-reading both Pride and Prejudice and North and South. Surfing the Net for materials and information I found your letter to Mr Darcy confessing your love for another man to him… It was a brilliant post and I linked it to mine. Can you explain what this letter was about? I just love it! (And I agree with you, as you know!)
I remember how excited I was when you posted on that – you were my first “unknown” comment! I felt like I’d been discovered.
I had just watched the Richard Armitage North & South adaptation when I started penning that letter. As a Victorian-phile (and a modern woman who likes a self-made man), I was totally smitten with Mr. Thornton (and Mr. Armitage). I had been very devoted to Darcy, defending him when my male friends mocked him, but I had to tell him that my heart now belonged to another. It was the right thing to do... I mean, wouldn’t he have done the same for Lizzy?

Do you still love Mr Thornton or are you preparing a letter to him to confess you’ve got a new literary crush?
Hahaha! I think Mr. Thornton is safe. Larry Darrell is appealing, but just isn’t my type.

Finally, period drama and films are something I like watching and writing about on my blog. What about you? What kind of films do you like? Do you like going to the cinema?
I’m also a big fan of period films, and probably most of the movies I list as my favorites are set in the past. I try to keep pace with the current cinema, but as in most things, I prefer the classics.



Glad to discover more about you, Kathleen. Thanks a lot for your kindness and good luck with all the great things you do. See you in the blogosphere!

RA FRIDAY - ON RICH & LIT

Do you remember my post about Richard and Art? I’ve been thinking about it and looking for something similar to write about this week . I wanted something I would be very interested in (well, I am very interested in the man himself but…) , I mean , a topic I’d love to write about in connection with Richard.


I 'm not a fan of red carpets and glamour, so I’m not going to write about his elegant tuxedo, his being so charming and smiling at the Baftas, but yes, I’ve peeped here and there to see what he was doing last Sunday afternoon and, well , he was not plumbing or sanding floors for his friends : he was signing autographs and being photographed in all his gorgeousness ( and we know he doesn’t like it that much, he said that more than once!) No, I’m not interested in that aspect of his work (though I saved "some" of those photos…how incredibly blue his eyes are!)  Have I ever  told you that I feel rather schizofrenic when it comes to my fondness for Mr RA? Look at the blue and the black in this post!


So what I 'd like  to highlight this time is how often has Richard’s carreer mingled with my own (career? My humble job?) Several times. And I’m glad of that. I have been able to use his work to give interesting lessons or have had the occasion to revise old stuff I had studied at university long ago lately.

Briefly and in conclusion , since I teach English literature , and am very interested in it too, my  post today will be about Richard and classic literature.

• Guy and the Medieval Popular Ballads


To teach  medieval literature (which  sounds so boring to 16-year-old ) I usually try to follow themes which can involve teenagers: this year I especially worked on popular ballads (ballads of love and family tragedy, ballads of magic and ballads of the outlaws)  and knighthood. What better occasion then to watch bits of BBC Robin Hood?
After reading parts of the ballad Robin Hood and Guy of Gisborne we saw some bits  from series 2 in the lab.


  Shakespeare retold,   Macbeth

One of the main contributing factors to Macbeth's hubris is his belief that he is invincible. Indeed, the witches have assured him that he cannot be vanquished by anyone "of woman born". Macbeth interprets that to mean everyone. In the climactic confrontation with Macduff, therefore, Macbeth is stunned to learn that Macduff was not, in the literal sense, "of woman born".


MACBETH
Let fall thy blade on vulnerable crests;
I bear a charmed life, which must not yield
To one of woman born.


MACDUFF
Despair thy charm,
And let the angel whom thou still hast served,
Tell thee, Macduff was from his mother's womb,
Untimely ripp'd




Richard studied classic drama and worked with the Royal Shakespeare Company. He says it was his first important job. He toured in a Macbeth on stage. Then he was Peter MacDuff in this modern TV version of Shakespeare's tragedy.
Since next year most of my first term lessons to the fourth year students  will be about Shakespearean plays I was planning to work on two tragedies and two comedies. One of the tragedies could be Macbeth. The bloodier a story is the more my students  (especially boys) like it, so it can be perfect.  It could be nice to compare a stage version of the play to this modern retelling (BBC Shakespeare Retold) in which RA plays Macbeth's antagonist, MacDuff.




In this Tv adaptation Duncan (Vincent Regan) is the celebrity chef proprietor of an elegant  restaurant, but the kitchen is in the hands of Joe Macbeth (James McAvoy), young, energetic, an arch-technician and great team leader in the kitchen. It is on the food that he cooks with such verve and brilliance - animal, visceral, not for the faint-hearted and certainly not for the vegetarian - that the reputation of the restaurant is built – or is it?Joe’s wife Ella (Keeley Hawes) is the Maitre d’, making sure that everything is in place for the perfect dining experience – immaculate linen, silver and glass, the ambience monochrome, stylishly stark yet restful.

Peter Macduff (Richard Armitage) is the Head Waiter, ensuring that the diners are served with food at the peak of perfection, the instant they desire it. He is a quiet, self-contained figure, watchful and acute, hearing all, seeing all and saying very little. We see then him as family man – he has the most conventional home-life of any of the characters, with a beautiful wife, two pretty little daughters, and a workaholic’s tensions at home.
He stays aloof from the team spirit of the kitchen, a lone wolf, keeping his counsel. Intelligent, watchful and suspicious, he is a quiet brooding presence, in contrast to the passion and energy of the kitchen crew.
And so, the tragic history of Macbeth unfolds in a modern setting.

(pictures and plot from http://www.richardarmitageonline.com/)


I'd love, for example, to compare the scene of Duncan's murder or of the final duel between Macbeth and MacDuff in the two completely different versions after reading Shakespeare's lines and then simply watch what the reactions will be and elicit discussion.

Lovelace, the rake in 18th century sentimental novel

I usually never teach Richardson to my students. I  just tell them he can be considered one of the fathers of the Novel but , can you imagine contemporary teenagers reading Pamela or Clarissa? I have already my troubles at working on Jane Austen or the Brontes with them, just try to imagine the tendency to yawning in those classes... it would be greatly stimulated!
I've learnt by experience they love Robinson Crusoe and Gulliver's Travels much  and usually we read several interesting passages from those books.
But what about just telling them briefly about the plots in Pamela and Clarissa as if they were the literary prototypes for modern soap operas and listen to some bits of the BBC4  Radio  Drama as listening comprehension tasks? I think even teenagers might enjoy some of those scenes. Which ones, I haven't decided yet . I'm sure they would laugh at melodrama but ... they might enjoy it. They would be free to criticize... only,  they'll have to do it in English!


 Lucas North and William Blake, the visionary poet


I liked Spooks and  even started loving  this TV drama  since RA joined the cast. His Lucas is a very intriguing character and his interest in William Blake makes him even more gripping. At least,  to me. Now, I'm not going to show my students shirtless Lucas and his tattoos to link the images to Blake's paintings or poems. But this is another interesting connection between Richard's work and literature, isn't it?


John Thornton and the industrial novel in the Victorian Age



This is one of my favourite period in literature and Victorian novels are what I most love teaching. Maybe my students started suspecting something ... I mean, that I pretty much love the literature of that period. I think it is very interesting to study the social-economic-historical background of the age and then recognize facts, events and ideas in literary works. When you can also add watching some beautiful scenes from period movies... I would have loved it so much as a student! But the lessons I got were so much more ... academic.

This is the second year I read and watch North and South (not the whole of it) with my last year students and it has been ... interesting to witness their reactions.
                                




Applause and relief  in the end ...


P.S. Forgive me for this very "literary" and school-based post but today it was last school day for me and ... yippee!!! I know , I know, still examinations and summer courses to go but ... no more regular lessons and it's like being on holiday a bit! Next week more RA and less school. Promise.
BTW, it was Friday when I started writing, it is Saturday now I'm posting. Good night!

09/06/2010

WHAT I'VE BEEN WATCHING - TIPPING THE VELVET & BRIGHT STAR

I had some time (not free, nor spare) to watch a couple of DVDs last weekend , DVDs that  had been on my TBS list for a while. As usual,  the weekend means huge ironing pile to me and that's how I, again, managed to find time for my beloved costume films.


1.  I started with the 3-part miniseries TIPPING THE VELVET (BBC 2002). I really wanted to see it but without knowing much about the plot nor the novel it was based on."It's Pride and Prejudice with dirty bits." That's how screenwriter Andrew Davies (Bridget Jones' Diary), in an interview contained on this DVD, describes his adaptation of Sarah Waters' acclaimed novel of lesbian love, betrayal, and redemption in Victorian England. I didn't find any P&P in it and, moreover I  was rather disappointed by Davies's script this time. I found it obvious or simplictic more than once. When I put it in the DVD player, I only wanted to see a costume TV series with several of my drama favourite actors/actresses : Keeley Hawes ( Our Mutual Friend, Wives and

Daughters, Under the Greenwood Tree, Spooks )  Jodhi May (The Other Boleyn Girl, Daniel Deronda, Emma 2009, Strike Back) , Sally Hawkins ( Persuasion 2007) and Hugh Bonneville (Lost in Austen, Miss Austen Regrets, Daniel Deronda). I din't know the protagonist Rachel Stirling (Nan) who was extremely good, instead. Well, though I didn't particularly like this series ,  I must recognize how talented the lead actresses were, all of them. I think  Tipping the Velvet's saving grace is just its actresses illustrating a vast and subtle range of emotions and reactions. They have a grace and sincerity often missing in contemporary films where actors make a show of their acting. Here, the women just are their characters.

Tipping the Velvet is based on a historical novel written by Sarah Waters published in 1998. Set in Victorian England during the 1890s, it tells a coming of age story about a young woman named Nan who falls in love with a male impersonator, Kitty, follows her to London, and finds various ways to support herself as she journeys through the city. I've read that the picaresque plot elements have prompted scholars and reviewers to compare it to similar British urban adventure stories written by Charles Dickens and Daniel Defoe. That maybe true, but I haven't read the book.

Now I've got also  Fingersmith in my TBS list, again set in the Victorian Age and based  on one of Sarah Waters's novel. Will it be better than this Tipping the Velvet? The protagonist is Rupert Evans (above on the right, also in North and South and  Emma 2009) ... I hope I'll like it more!

2. BRIGHT STAR (2009)
I had longed to watch this movie since I saw the first stills and read the announcement. I wrote about it  and made a slide of the pics  I found but... since I got the DVD I couldn' t find the right moment for it and went on delaying watching. I feared I might be disappointed after such expectations. Was I ? A bit, actually.
The title of the movie is taken from one of John Keats’s poems, a sonnet, dedicated to Fanny Browne, the woman he loved. The story is  compelling and  I already knew when I started watching but I thought I'd be more involved while I wasn't,  instead. There was something missing, something I can't explain. As if I had prepared lots of tissues and  din't need them. I liked the movie, especially its beautiful natural setting but the script wasn't involving and I can't blame the actors who did what they could with it. I was rather disappointed in Jane Campion, whose The Piano I had loved so much!

The story
The movie tells the story of the tragic romance between JOHN KEATS, one othe English Romantic poets of the second generation, and Fanny Brawne. Keats has now become one of the most popular poets in the English language, but he died at 25 convinced to be a failure.

Keats, played by Ben Whishaw, met Fanny, Abbie Cornish in the movie, at his friend Charles Brown’s house in 1818 and soon fell in love with her. She was 18 and he was 23. He had already lost his mother for tuberculosis and his brother Tom would soon follow her, just when John himself started showing the first symptoms of the terrible desease.
The screenplay is based on the letters that the poet wrote to his beloved, letters which were published only after Fanny’s death.


Keats had abandoned his studies in Medicine to dedicate his life to poetry but could hardly live on it. So Fanny’s mother, at the beginning, didn’t approve him as her daughter’s wooer. Despite his health troubles, Keats was a cheerful person, full of life, and with the passing of time Fanny started to return his love. The two lovers got engaged, but their happiness was definitely short. In February 1820, on a cold evening, Keats got back home feverish and started coughing blood, an undeniable sign of his next end.

After a while, sure of his approaching death, he wrote to Fanny suggesting to break their engagement but she firmly refused and he couldn’t hide his relief. After seeing his terrible health conditions, Fanny’s mother hosted him in their house where he lived for three months. But his doctor and his friends stirred him to go to Italy where the mild climate might have helped improve his health.

He had seen his mother and his brother die for that illness and, maybe, he didn’t want to give Fanny the same terrible sorrow he had suffered, so he accepted the proposal of leaving England for Italy. She gave him the paper to write to her and a marble oval, used at that time to cool high temperature. He left with his friend, painter John Severn, but he was quarantined for several days at Naples port so when he finally arrived in Rome his health was seriously compromised. He lived at “La Casina Rossa”, next to the Spanish Steps at Piazza di Spagna for about 3 months, dying there on the 23rd of February 1821, at 25.

He never wrote to Fanny nor read her letters but wanted them to be buried with him with a curl of her hair.
On his grave, at Testaccio Protestant Cemetery in Rome, no name nor date were written, just these words: “Here lies one whose name was writ in water”. From the letters Fanny later wrote to her sister, we know she remained deeply in love with the poet. She accepted to get married only after 9 years from his death and had three children. She kept Keats’s letters till her death - secretly from her husband.

BRIGHT STAR is coming out in Italian theatres next Friday 11  June . But if  like me you prefer to watch  it in the original language, you can buy the DVD here.

08/06/2010

INTERVIEW WITH CHARLOTTE HAWKINS, AUTHOR OF "THE TEMPEST: A GUY OF GISBORNE STORY"

Charlotte Hawkins is pen-name for Sarah Pawley. She has just published a novel with a very special protagonist, one of Robin Hood’s nemesis, Guy of Gisborne. He is the protagonist this time and gets the girl in the end. It is a romance Sarah wrote partly inspired by Richard Armitage’s Gisborne.


Sarah lives near Fort Knox, Kentucky but she grew up near Chicago. She is not married and has no children, so she spend most of her free time pursuing a writing career. She admits she is hopelessly romantic.

INTERVIEW & DOUBLE GIVEAWAY
Sarah has kindly accepted to be my guests and answer some questions about her novel, The Tempest, A Guy of Gisborne Story , and especially about its protagonist.  Reading through the interview and leaving your comment and your e-mail address, two of you will have the chance to receive a brand new copy of The Tempest directly from its author! Open worldwide. Winners will be announced on Monday 14th June.

 First of all Sarah, would you mind to explain why you chose your pen name, Charlotte Hawkins? Is there any particular reason?
Charlotte is after my favorite author, Charlotte Bronte. Hawkins is after Jim Hawkins, from Treasure Island, which is one of my favorite stories. I always thought the name Hawkins had a strong sound.

Then, your choice of Gisborne, a villain, one of Robin Hood’s nemesis, as the protagonist of your novel,"The Tempest – A Guy of Gisbone Story” which is a romance. Being one of those who have Gisborne in mind as Richard Armitage, ( I have seen other RH adaptations but Gisborne was not in them), I can imagine why one can like him … ehm ... joking! What I really appreciated was the complexity this character had in BBC series, really. I’ve written enough about that here on my blog. What was that made you decide he was your hero ?
I wrote a little about this in my author’s note of my book. Here it is:
“ One villain that is not so well known is Guy of Gisborne, though he first appeared centuries ago in the early ballads and songs. He has made occasional appearances in small rolls, and there is sometimes a Guy-like character in the Robin Hood tales…a second banana who is there to suffer on behalf of the Sheriff or Prince John, or sometimes both. (Remember “Sir Hiss” in the cartoon?) There are only a few instances where the Guy character has been given a more substantial part to play, the most recent being the brilliant portrayal given by Richard Armitage. I am certainly a great fan of his, but my interest in Guy of Gisborne goes much further back, to the 1938 classic “The Adventures of Robin Hood.”

I adore Basil Rathbone (In my opinion, no one else can be Sherlock Holmes) and it was he who first turned me towards liking the bad instead of the good. No offense to the Errol Flynn fans out there, but I always wished it was Guy who got the girl instead of Robin. There’s something about those silly green tights that just bothers me.
To make a long story short, I’ve always had a weakness for the bad guys, and for once I want to tell one of their stories in a different way. I like dark, conflicted men in a story. They’re much more interesting to me than the squeaky clean heroes we all know. So here is a story about Guy of Gisborne, one of my all-time favorite villains. Yes, there will be a Sheriff of Nottingham here, along with Marian and Robin Hood, but they will only be playing a small part. This is all about Sir Guy of Gisborne, and I hope it’s a story you’ll enjoy”.

Good! I’m sure I’ll enjoy it . What’s your favourite Robin Hood adaptation ever ?
I have to confess that the Disney cartoon is my favorite. It was my first inroduction to the Robin Hood legend, so it has a special place in my heart.

 Have you seen the latest movie starring Russel Crowe? If you did , what do you think of Ridley Scott’s version?
I thought it was too dark in tone. I thought it lacked the sparkle and sense of fun that most of the Robin Hood stories have.


Let’s go back to our Guy. I’ve read fan fiction on line in which Guy succeeds in making Marian love him…. and they lived happily ever after … your choice is different, instead. Tell us something about it.
After the first season of Robin Hood, Marian lost my vote, so to speak. I thought her manipulation of Guy was very cruel, considering how he came to her aide on several occasions. I thought he needed someone better, so I decided to give him his own love and his own happily ending.

 As for Guy and Marian, if you could have written the end of BBC Robin Hood series 2 yourself, what would your finale be?
I don’t think it was in character for Guy to murder Marian. I think it would have made more sense to make her death accidental, or to have the Sheriff commit the crime.

What do you think of series 3 instead? Unexpected twists. Don’t you think so?Yes...too many. I think the writers needed to streamline the stories in the third season. It took too many directions, in my opinion, and I lost interest before it was finished.

Let’s go back to writing. You wrote other books before The Tempest. Can you tell us something about them?
“Oh, That I Had Wings” and “Finding Grace” are two literary novels that I recently wrote and published. The stories link together, one being about a young man’s escape from poverty and ignornace, and the other being about his younger sister, who takes a similar journey. Both are romantic stories, but nothing too risque. They are mostly based on stories I’ve heard throughtout my life, drawn from people and places I’ve known.

 When did you start writing? Is it a full time activity or a part-time hobby?
I’ve been writing off and on since I was a child. I’ve always had an overactive imagination, and my father is a great storyteller, so I think it rubbed off on me. Unfortunately I don’t write full-time at the moment, but I hope to do so someday.

What kind of reader are you? What are your favourite authors / genres?
I read a little bit of everything. I used to read a lot of romance novels when I was a teenager, but these days, I’m more into non-fiction, particularly books about history. Over the last few years, however, reading has taken a backseat to writing.

 I’m fond of period drama and films. What about you? Have you got any favourite ones?
I love period films. One of my most loved is “Sense and Sensibility” with Emma Thompson. I know it didn’t follow the book very closely, but I still adore it. And of course, I love “North and South.” Ever since I first saw John Thornton, my life has never been the same.


 I think I know what you mean. But I must stick to my seriousness, I'm the interviewer and not be distracted by any of the JT syndrome effects now! Are you working on a new book?
Yes, I’m working on a sequel to “The Tempest.” It’s about one of Guy’s daughters, who falls for a Robin Hood kind of rouge. I started it several months ago, but my muse left me. LOL. Over the last few weeks, I’ve started working on it again, so hopefully I’ll get in finished by later this year. We’ll see what happens.

Good luck then with your new novel
and thank you very much indeed for being my guest, Sarah!
I can't wait to read Guy's romance! My copy is in the mail, isn't it?

For 2 of you readers of Fly High , instead, there's the chance to win a copy of this novel.
Leave your comment and e-mail address. The giveaway is open worldwide. Winners will be announced next Monday 14th June.

07/06/2010

AVALON'S GIVEAWAY WINNER + CONSOLATION PRIZE FOR THE OTHERS!!!

Last weeek you had the opportunity to meet Avalon on Fly High!, in  my weekly chat with one of  My Blogger Buddies. Have you read her interview? It's really special ! And have you visited  Avalon's Blog? As I promised,  today the winner of her Bury My Heart At Wounded Knee (DVD)  will be revealed.
But, I'm afraid , I have to complain ... just a bit...I 'm always there begging you to add your e-mail addresses ladies and girls with no result at all... no way , not in this post at least! I know I must have  your addresses somewhere in my computer or on my blog since you already commented or wrote to me but could you please help me next time? I'm entering all the names because I'm sure  this is what Avalon wants, and this is HER giveaway, of course ....Next time ... I'll be inflexible!!!
Here is the list of contenders... (I hope I know the winner and I will be able to get in touch with her somehow! )

1. Linda Henderson
2. Mulubinba
3. M.Gray
4. Traxy
5. Jackie
6. time4t
7. TeeTotallyNot
8. Phylly3

And here's the winning number...


TeeTotallyNot!!!

Could you please get in touch with me (my e-mail address is on the right sidebar) and send me your address to arrange the mailing of the DVD to you with Avalon? Thanks a lot and ... congratulations!!!

Since most of the ladies in the list above are RA's admirers,  here is a consolation prize for those of them who didn't win... not a booby prize, is it?

Richard Armitage  at Bafta 2010, yesterday June 6th