(by guest blogger Elizabeth Eckhart)
The Lord of the Rings,
The Hobbit and J.R.R. Tolkien are
all phrases considered synonymous with high fantasy. Since The Hobbit’s publication
seventy-five years ago, the consensus among fans and critics is that J.R.R.
Tolkien was one of the most, if not the most, ingenious fantasy writers
to have ever existed. Even the less-than-habitual reader recognizes Tolkien’s
legacy, and rightfully credits him with the onslaught of fantasy novels we
enjoy today. Tolkien did more than bring back the the fantastical elements
children and adults had been missing since the era of the Brothers Grimm -- he
also thoroughly altered them. Because of Tolkien, we began to see tall,
beautiful elves instead of tiny, mischievous creatures; the beginning of an
elves vs. dwarves racism that carries into hundreds of subsequent fantasy
novels; and even larger tropes such as the necessity for a world other than
ours, war on an epic scale, an almost undefeatable enemy and, of course, a
small band of heroes. Tolkien is credited with the popularity of the reluctant,
anti-hero (think Bilbo and Frodo in comparison to Beowulf) who defeats the
enemy in some way other than hand-to-hand combat. The list, of course, goes on.
As do the books. Since
the publication of The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings trilogy,
book stores have been filled with both worthy imitations of Tolkien’s work,
and, well, some less than brilliant attempts to recreate the magic of Tolkien’s
work. No need to name titles, yet we all know the type of book being pointed
out. Generally paperback, has some half-naked or sexualized character (male or
female) on the cover and, if read, follows every predictable fantasy trope on
the market. While a few are enjoyable as light reads, most leave the reader
with a bad taste in their mouth and a feeling of dissatisfaction -- like we’ve
just eaten the no fat, gluten free, sugar free version of our favorite meal.
J.R.R. Tolkien was a
linguist and a scholar of medieval literature, making the depth of his novels,
informed by the works he studied for decades, impossible to imitate.
Those who do can only produce shoddier, twisted versions of the same tale. So
what can we do as writers and readers to help preserve the magic Tolkien
created? For guidance, we can look at a few popular, well-written books that
would likely not exist without Tolkien’s input to the sub-genre of fantasy, but
also have moved past the black hole that many fantasy writers get sucked into:
the one of LOTR’s elves, dwarves, and quests.
The Chronicles of Narnia
The Hobbit was first published in 1937, and the first
Chronicles of Narnia appeared shortly after, in 1950. Perhaps C.S. Lewis
had the benefit of not being entirely submerged in the Tolkien obsession that
would only grow as the years passed on. However, there are a few things that
cemented the differences between the two tales, and made Lewis’s tale as
original and unforgettable as Tolkien’s. For one, The Chronicles of Narnia
featured children as heroes, and while they were not perfect, often wanting to
go home, their age and relationship separated them from Tolkien’s band of
heroes. C.S. Lewis also mixed Christian themes, and borrowed ideas from
Persian, Greek, Anatolian and Roman mythology, as well as traditional British
and Irish fairy tales. Beyond that, his magical creatures were inherently
different than Tolkien’s, since Lewis opted for regular animals who could talk,
and creatures borrowed from mythology, like fauns.
A Song of Ice and Fire
Whether or not you are a
fan of the series -some may find the endless characters tiresome- one has to at
least admit that George R.R. Martin’s series, beginning with A Game of
Thrones, is one of the few books in the last twenty years to escape feeling
like a regurgitation of Tolkien’s work despite being written with many of the
same themes, and even featuring dragons. Martin’s series stands out because he
chose to broke the format Tolkien began, which generally plods along with the
discovery of the hero, convincing the hero to help, following the hero and his
gang along their quest, and eventually, finding success. Instead, Martin has an
astounding number of characters, all with faults and good sides and frankly, we
aren’t sure who we’re cheering for (except that it’s not Joffrey Baratheon).
On top of that, Martin may enlist familiar creatures like dragons, but he also
focuses primarily on his own Big Bad creation -a form of deadly ice monsters,
called White Walkers, threatening to take over all of the south, which besides
being evil, sound refreshingly unlike Orcs.
HisDark Materials
This trilogy of fantasy
novels, beginning with The Golden Compass in 1995, like Chronicles
of Narnia features children in the lead roles. I first read the trilogy as
a kid, but even then knew I was encountering many themes I wouldn’t fully understand
until I was an adult. The only thing I can recall Philip Pullman
borrowing from Tolkien and the High Fantasy genre is the creation of an
alternative world, and the grand struggle of good vs. evil. Beyond that,
Pullman pulled the focus of his novels toward themes of physics, philosophy,
and theology. It’s also interesting that Pullman’s work was an inversion of
John Milton’s Paradise Lost. Beyond that, Pullman’s work features an
entirely different species of supernatural, most notably his use of dæmons: the
beloved animal embodiments of inner-selves.
Harry Potter
Harry Potter is another children’s series, and is well known
for its series of both novels and films. Like Lord of the Rings, Harry’s
story consists of a major evil entity who seeks to rule over the world and
destroy lesser races. It also centers around wizards. However, J.K. Rowling
wrote her wizards rather differently than had previously been done; she often
made them goofy, ordinary people. It was never inherent that every wizard be as
wize or powerful as Gandalf the Grey or Saruman the White. Though Rowling used
familiar races such as giants, elves, and goblins, she made sure hers stood out
from previous uses of the same races. Her goblins were highly intelligent. So
brainy, in fact, that they were entrusted with the wizarding bank, and her
elves were not beautiful or cold -- they were hideous and generally timid
creatures.
The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit are not the only major
influences to high fantasy. Other notable contributions include Malazan Book
of the Fallen and The Worm Ouroboros. But, it seems Tolkien’s work
is often viewed as the canon, and more than the themes of distinct worlds, epic
stature, and anti-heroes, many have found the need to imitate his
versions of elves, dwarves, and more. If Dungeons and Dragons is any
hint, much of Tolkien’s world seems to permeate virtually every vehicle of
fantasy, and what might be considered fan fiction -slightly altered versions of
his stories- has long been viewed as acceptable to publish. A good amount of
fans may eat this type of fantasy up in order to diminish Tolkien cravings.
However it’s the original works, who respect Tolkien’s example yet provide
original ideas and creations, whose popularity endure the passing of time. For
writers, it may be wise to examine your material and question: “how much of
this is based on assumed fantasy basics?” And “how much can be changed to
diminish direct ties to the hundreds of books that came before it?” For
readers, too, it may be tempting to grab the newest Tolkien look-alike, and opt
for the fantasy novel that looks entirely unfamiliar. Who knows? You may find
that the cure for Tolkien cravings is within an unexpected and strange new
world.
Elizabeth
Eckhart is a film and entertainment blogger for DirectTVcomparison.com. She first picked up The Lord of the Rings when
she was twelve and read The Hobbit shortly after. One of the fondest
memories she has is explaining to her grandfather during the theatrical
premiere of The Two Towers that no, they weren’t
continually showing flashbacks, there were in fact, four different hobbits.
What about Star Wars and the Babylon 5 TV series? I think they borrowed from Tolkien - Babylon 5's Rangers were like the Rangers of the North in LotR, and Star Wars' Obi Wan 'fell' to Darth Wader just as Gandalf 'fell' to the Balrog, just as examples.
ReplyDeleteWhat an interesting post--I learned a lot, nodded my head a lot, and generally just enjoyed reading about the roots of our modern mythology.
ReplyDeleteJunewilliams, you are so right! I didn't really focus on films, but you make such a good point. I think anything that can be classified as an "epic" has to give some credit to Tolkien. And people claim Star Wars gets copied all the time... guess they aren't looking back far enough.
ReplyDeleteAnd JaneGS, thanks! I appreciate it!
That's a bit short....There's so much to say abiout Tolkien influence on Fantasy. ^^
ReplyDeleteRobin Hobb said she was mostly influenced by LOTR -
etc, etc.....